|
|||||
|
Forecasting R-134a emissions from car air conditioning systems until 2020 in Germany Winfried Schwarz, Oeko-Recherche, Buero fuer Umweltforschung, Frankfurt/M. Since Kyoto 1997 the greenhouse gases subject to emission reduction commitments under the UN Climate Convention include the fluorinated compounds SF6, PFCs and HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons). The latter are by far the most important ones among these so-called "F-gases". The 5.2% (industrial countries) or 21% (German) reduction target refers not to each individual one of the basket of gases (before Kyoto only CO2, methane, and nitrous oxide had been under consideration), but to their total expressed in CO2 equivalent emissions. For this reason the HFC 134a, which represents three quarters of the worldwide HFC production, got under international pressure just seven years after its introduction into the market. The Kyoto decision confronted environmental policymakers with a number of problems: What are the applications of fluorinated gases like? What quantities are they used for? How much of the gases in use are released to the atmosphere in the short, middle or long run? What can be said about their present and future consumption and emission levels, what can be done to reduce their emissions? In Germany our consultancy was asked to address these questions. The result was the 1999 report on behalf of the German Umweltbundesamt (Öko-Recherche 1999), of which numerous findings were adopted in the recently passed Climate Protection Programme 2000 of the German Government. Car air-conditioning second largest HFC emitter: ca. 3.500 t/aAccording to our study the overall domestic HFC emissions will come to 20 million tons CO2 equivalent by 2010/11 assuming that present usage trends continue (business-as-usual scenario). Their share in total direct greenhouse gas emissions will then have risen to some 2.5%.Refrigerants (only R-134a) from car air-conditioning (A/C) will contribute about a quarter of the overall HFC emissions, namely roughly 4.5 million tonnes CO2 equivalent. Quantitatively, car air-conditioning will be the second largest source of HFC emissions after the sector of refrigeration and stationary air-conditioning. The index of the global warming potential (GWP) of R-134a is 1,300, i.e. the 1,300-fold of CO2. The 4.5 million tonnes CO2 equivalent are calculated from roughly 3,500 metric tonnes emissions which in our estimations are most likely to be the emission levels by 2010/11. Our emission forecasting includes other mobile air-conditioning systems installed in buses, lorries, ships, railcars. Their emissions, however, are relatively small compared with HFC emissions from car A/C. Other mobile A/C refrigerant emissions will contribute less than 5% of the emissions from car A/C systems. The following, therefore, deals exclusively with car A/C systems.Climate effect: 2/3 from additional fuel consumption, 1/3 from direct refrigerant emissionsLet us first look at the question of direct and indirect global warming contribution of car A/C systems included in the concept of Total Equivalent Warming Impact (TEWI). In Germany, the most comprehensive studies of additional energy consumption caused by car A/C systems had been made by the Behr company in 1997. According to them, the average additional fuel consumption caused by a car air-conditions system in our climate region is almost 100 litres annually. Assuming a 12 years service life of a car, the additional fuel consumption totals to 1,200 litres burning to about 2.6 tons of CO2.The direct emissions of R-134a depend on the emission rate. The problem is that nowhere in the world empirical studies of the long-term emissions from car A/C systems have been carried out. That is not so surprising in the case of R-134a systems, since the first of them started running just ten years ago, in 1990. But concerning R-12 systems, there are no empirical investigations available, either. We get reassured: "The emissions of 134a are by far not so high as in the days of R-12 when three charges of refrigerant during car life time had to be calculated." The engineers point out the more careful handling while servicing (intermediate suction extracting and storing of the refrigerant), the little losses during car life time (more impermeable hoses and improved shaft sealing), the possible suction extraction in end-of-life car scrapping instead of releasing the refrigerant into the atmosphere. But real measurements actually proving the lowered refrigerant emission rates are not available. Up to now they have not been carried out at all. Thus we also have to rely on experts' estimations for the time beeing.
Most experts assess the emission rate of the average car A/C at "roughly 10%", taking together service losses, running losses (including such in case of frontal car accidents), and disposal losses. To us, this value seems to be rather low under current technological conditions. Applying a 10% as the lower limit of annual refrigerant loss and assuming a refrigerant charge of 0.84 kg (the latter was the average charge of new A/C units installed in new registered cars in Germany 1997), the 134a emissions total within 12 years to 1 kg. In terms of climate impact the one kilogramm of refrigerant equals 1.3 tons of CO2. To recall: CO2 from additional fuel consumption per average car is in the range of 2.6 tons. Summarizing, the overall global warming contribution of a single average car A/C system comes to two thirds from additional fuel (mainly for driving the compressor) and to one third from escaping refrigerant. That fact alone demonstrates the high reduction potential, at least a third, if we succeed in constructing and establishing new car A/C systems of the same efficiency like the current ones but without global warming refrigerant emissions.Old CFC stock emissions not suitable as orientation for forecasting HFC emissions Alternatives to HFC refrigerants face the following objection again and again: HFCs are a very good solution. Without them the CFC replacement would not have taken place. The CFC 12, which is being substituted by HFCs, contributes not only to damaging the ozone layer, but also to damaging the climate due to its high GWP of 8000 which is six times more than the 1,300 GWP of R-134a. In other words, the historic CFC emissions from mobile air conditioning systems are not suitable to serve as a model to assess the future global warming HFC emissions. Forecasting the R-134a emissions from car A/C up to the year 2010 and afterwards requires a model with dynamic parameters. Methodological approach and assumptions in emission forecasting What are the most important assumptions made in our study? Forecasting always needs simplifying assumptions which will never completely be proven by reality but just more ore less. Our study proceeded as follows. First of all we asked all seven domestic car manufacturers and the 21 importers selling more than 8,000 car units annually for all their 202 models sold in Germany from 1995 to 1998: How many cars were sold on the German market, how many of them were equipped with A/C systems, and how much refrigerant did these systems contain each. The collected answers provide a rather good survey as well as a solid data base for estimating the real domestic car air conditioning trend. In foreign makes the A/C ratio of new registrations rose 1995-1998 from 12% to 42%, in German makes the A/C ratio moved on a generally higher level from 30% to 74%. The specific refrigerant charge dropped in the same time frame in foreign makes from 0,77 to 0,73 kg. In German makes the average charge also dropped, again on a higher level, from 0,86 to 0,83 kg. The data up to now presented were empirically based. They all end in 1998. Beyond that the emission calculation needs assumptions for the future. These are the following ones.
Certainly, the most important assumptions are the 6th and 7th dealing with the emission behavior of the car A/C systems. Constant emission rates of 10% and 12,5%, respectively For lack of empirical measurements in our model the assumed operating emissions rate is steady at 10% of the accumulated refrigerant stock. Over a system life of 12 years, 10% loss per year corresponds to 120% refrigerant loss, 100% being one system charge. This 120% figure is made up of two half-refills to top up emission losses, and two times 10% maintenance loss. In our eyes, that is the lower limit. (Further estimates of the emission rate: AFCE 1998; IPCC 2000; UNEP-RTOC 1998; Baker 1999; Preisegger 1999.) Additionally we have to consider disposal emissions arising 12 years after the registration. Our study assumes a one-off recovery loss upon scrapping of 30% of the total charge. Surely, that is a crucial point. For this evacuation of the refrigerant out of the A/C system before shredding the car body according to the German Statutory Ordinance on end-of-life vehicles does not really take place. We could not find one single dismantling plant at least owning a suction extraction device to empty the refrigerant. Certainly among the about 1000 dismantlers there are some having such a device. So we made the optimistic assumption that from 2005 onwards everything will be much better, at the time when the first annual cohorts containing R-134a will be scrapped and the EU end-of-life vehicle directive will show its effects. Business-as-Usual emissions forecast 1995 - 2020 Diagram 2 grafically illustrates the calculated total R-134a emissions from car A/C systems over the 1995-2020 period. Until 2010 these emissions will steeply rise. From 2010 onwards to 2020 and after 2020 they will in principle remain at that high level. Emission reduction scenario: CO2-systems from 2007 onwards The operating conditions of mobile air conditioning (MAC) systems (vibrations, open compressors, flexible piping) limit the possibilities to reduce emissions of their refrigerants. Dispensing entirely with air-conditioning may be the most straightforward solution from an environmental perspective, but has been unrealistic since A/C systems became mass-consumed goods in Europe, too (see Holdack-Janssen 1998). The low-GWP alternative refrigerant with a good chance of succeeding is above all carbon dioxide. Global warming contribution: 4.5 million t CO2 equivalent or nought Diagram 4 shows separately for the BaU Scenario and the Reduction Scenario how global warming contribution of R-134a emissions develops over the 1995-2020 period.
|
|||||